Video, Streaming, Digital Millenium Copyright
Act, Internet Service Provider, Motion for Summary Judgment, Safe Harbors from
Copyright Infringement
Viacom International, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19 (Second Circuit April 5,
2012). District court granted summary
judgment holding that YouTube and Google were entitled to DMCA safe harbor
protections for broadcasting 79,000 copyrighted videos from 2005 to 2009. District court held that absent
item-specific knowledge of each video triggering a takedown duty, YouTube was
entitled to the safe harbor. On appeal,
Second Circuit upheld the standard, but remanded because a reasonable jury
could conclude that YouTube had such knowledge.
The Second Circuit also referred the question of potential “willful
blindness” for further factfinding. The
Second Circuit made clear that DMCA safe harbors, though, did not depend on
monitoring systems being set up and that the DMCA does not create such an
affirmative duty to monitor for potentially infringing content. The issue of whether YouTube had the right
and ability to control infringing content was also remanded. In remanding, the Second Circuit noted that
YouTube’s licensing of content to third parties presented “the closest case”
for taking YouTube outside the provisions of the DMCA Safe Harbor, but that
from the record it was not clear that any such allegedly infringed clips were involved
in the third-party licensing transactions.
www.dunnington.com
Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook 2012-2013 by Raymond J. Dowd from West
here
No comments:
Post a Comment