Showing posts with label acta anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label acta anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Show all posts

Sunday, January 22, 2012

New Petition to White House To End ACTA Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement

If you thought SOPA and PIPA were bad, they have nothing on ACTA, which hands over copyright law and policy to an unaccountable trade collective.

I have posted in the past on ACTA, learn more here and here.

Here is the text of a petition to the White House to end ACTA, the link is here if you would like to sign it.   https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/end-acta-and-protect-our-right-privacy-internet/MwfSVNBK

we petition the obama administration to:


End ACTA and Protect our right to privacy on the Internet


The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, or ACTA, is a 'plurilateral' trade agreement, currently being negotiated between the US, Canada, Japan, the European Union, South Korea, Mexico, Switzerland, Australia and New Zealand. It is somewhat similar to SOPA/PIPA, however ACTA is an executive agreement between countries besides the United States, and it can be passed without the approval from Congress and the Supreme Court. It is potentially hazardous to the Internet we know and how it works.

We need to stop ACTA before it is finally approved by all countries involved. If you value your privacy and you don't want "Big Brother" watching over you, sign this petition and spread the word. Research ACTA and see just how dangerous it is to the Internet, our privacy, and our liberties.

www.dunnington.com
 Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook 2011 by Raymond J. Dowd from West here  

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

The Fashion Business: Counterfeit and Customs Issues - June 24 Webinar

From my good friend Olivera Medenica....


The Fashion Business: Counterfeit and Customs Issues
Join us for a Webinar on June 24

This webinar will go over how to efficiently address counterfeit products and grey market goods. This webinar will cover topics such as: trademark filings, the difference between trademark infringement, counterfeit products, and counterfeit goods, special issues relating to counterfeit products online, strategies to stop counterfeiting, stopping goods at the border, using Customs to protect your trademark, strategies to prevent your goods from being detained by Customs, and classification issues.
Cost: $65.00
Title: The Fashion Business: Counterfeit and Customs Issues
Date: Friday, June 24, 2011
Time: 12:00 PM - 1:30 PM EDT
After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the Webinar.

System Requirements
PC-based attendees
Required: Windows® 7, Vista, XP or 2003 Server
Macintosh®-based attendees
Required: Mac OS® X 10.4.11 (Tiger®) or newer

Space is limited.
Reserve your Webinar seat now at:
https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/994208966

 http://www.dunnington.com/rdowd_bio.html
 Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook 2010 by Raymond J. Dowd from West here  

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

ACTA Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement: Final Version is Out, Lobbying Starts



Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement educational video above.

More on ACTA here.

EFF's take on ACTA here.

ACTA final draft here.

The European Commission is apparently pushing the European Parliament to drop its skepticism, Techdirt story here.

More on why ACTA's secretive nature is problematic here.

http://www.dunnington.com/rdowd_bio.html
 Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook 2010 by Raymond J. Dowd from West here  

Wednesday, March 02, 2011

IP Law Professors: Obama Secret Anticounterfeiting Treaty Unconstitutional Without Congressional Approval



Still the best explanation out there of how a bill moves through Congress to become a law, although it omits the role of lobbyists and corporations in initiating laws. But lots of law professors think that the Obama Administration's forgotten the Schoolhouse Rock video many of us grew up with.

Thirty law professors think that the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement ought to work the same way - by going through Congress and that ACTA is unconstitutional because it purports to be and will be a binding treaty internationally under the doctrine of pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept), but without Congressional approval, is not enforceable domestically and thus requires Congressional approval.   But according to the 30 professors, other countries will be able to punish US noncompliance with countermeasures consistent with international law.   The professors point out that even the most radical exponents of unilateral Presidential action don't believe that the President can act unilaterally where powers are specifically reserved to Congress by Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution.

The professors urge that if President Obama signs ACTA, he should reserve the right of Congress to approve it before it becomes binding.  This, according to the professors, would protect us under international law in the case of non-implementation.

More on ACTA and the Obama Administration's IP Czar here.

The EFF's take on why you should care here.

International IP and the Public Interest call for IP law professors to sign on here.
Final text of ACTA via the United States Trade Representative here.

Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate IP.

U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 8

Article 1 - The Legislative Branch
Section 8 - Powers of Congress

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.



The 30 professors opposing ACTA below, their position paper here.

Sean M. Flynn
(Counsel of Record)
American University Washington College of Law
4801 Massachusetts Ave NW
Washington D.C. 20016

Brook Baker Northeastern School of Law

Dan L. Burk University of California, Irvine School of Law

Brian W. Carver University of California, Berkeley School of Information

Anthony Falzone Stanford Law School

Eric Fink Elon University School of Law

Michael Geist University of Ottawa School of Law

Llewellyn Joseph Gibbons University of Toledo School of Law

Leah Chan Grinvald Saint Louis University School of Law

Amy Kapczynski University of California, Berkeley School of Law

Dennis S. Karjala Arizona State University College of Law

Julian Kinderlerer University of Cape Town Department of Private Law

Lawrence Lessig Harvard Law School

David Levine Elon University School of Law

Jamie Lund St. Mary‟s University School of Law

Michael J. Madison University of Pittsburgh School of Law

Dr. Jeremy Malcolm Consumers International

Mark P. McKenna University of Notre Dame Law School

Michael Morris University of Edinburgh School of Law

Ira Nathenson St. Thomas University School of Law

Kevin Outterson Boston University School of Law

Frank Pasquale Seton Hall Law School

Varun Piplani George Washington University

Kenneth L. Port William Mitchell College of Law

Srividhya Ragavan University of Oklahoma College of Law

Wendy Seltzer Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy

Jessica Silbey Suffolk University Law School

Christopher Sprigman University of Virginia School of Law

Yousuf A. Vawda University of KwaZulu Natal Faculty of Law

Peter K. Yu Drake University Law School


 Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook 2010 by Raymond J. Dowd from West here  

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Obama Administration's 2010 IP Enforcement Strategic Plan

New report from the Obama Administration's IP Czar
2010 Joint Strategic Plan on IP Enforcement


 Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook from West here  

Monday, June 21, 2010

ACTA Update: Endorse A Petition Opposing ACTA

If you would like to voice your concern about the pending Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a petition is going out soon, to view it and sign up, the link is below:

PIJIP: - American University Washington College of Law

My comments on ACTA here  and here.


Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook from West here

Saturday, June 05, 2010

ACTA Update: Obama Administration's IP Strategy Comes Under Fire From Tech Associations

For background on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, visit the excellent Wikipedia page.

Last week my post on ACTA was picked up in a very kind and thoughtful review by Mike Masnik, of Techdirt, here. Thanks, Mike!  I didn't know anyone read my blog.

My take on ACTA, agreeing with EFF that Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty is a Sham" here.

A great analysis (in a more subdued and more thoughtful - and thus credible - Washingtontonian way), from the Center for Democracy you will find here.   Looking past the measured language, they are accusing copyright lobbyists of wishing to get through ACTA what they might not get in the US, take over Third World governments and use ACTA as a means of cramming copyright content into those countries' media systems while completely depriving the citizens of those countries of rights equivalent to the First Amendment.

And below a link to recent developments on Capitol Hill - consumer electronics trade associations waking up to ACTA's implications: Consumer Electronics Association, TechAmerica and the Computer & Communications Industry Association

Three tech associations oppose Obama IP effort on anti-counterfeiting deal - The Hill's Hillicon Valley

Ben Scheffner's March 3, 2010 post of a letter from USTR Ron Kirk to Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Or) claiming that ACTA would not alter existing US law here.

Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook from West here