Showing posts with label sanctions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sanctions. Show all posts

Saturday, November 26, 2016

Ninth Circuit - Copyright Infringement - Nina Simone Estate - Subsequent Events Doctrine Makes Personal Service OK



 In Stroud Prods. & Ents. Inc. v. Castle Rock Ent. Inc, --- Fed.Appx. --- 2016 WL 6211984 (9th Cir. 2016) the Ninth Circuit invokes the "subsequent events doctrine" - that is that subsequent events can validate a prematurely-filed appeal.

The wife of Nina Simone's late husband Andrew Stroud (1926 to 2012) argued that there was no jurisdiction over her because she had not been served and that even if she had been served, she had not yet appointed as a representative of the estate of her late husband or properly substituted in as a party.   In reviewing the efforts to serve her in New York, the court approved of the diligent efforts to serve her four times (including on a Saturday) and rejected her arguments that the papers needed to be left with the doorman because the doorman did not block access to her unit.

In upholding sanctions, the Ninth Circuit noted that the trial court had found that the defendant and her counsel had engaged in gamesmanship, bad faith, misconduct and delay.

Some information on Nina Simone and Andrew Stroud here.

Full decision here.

Monday, August 12, 2013

Copyright Law - Sixth Circuit - Plaintiff's Counsel Sanctioned Over $500,000 For Lousy Lawyering

Copyright Infringements, Ethics, Sanctions, Attorney Sanctions, Attorneys Fees

Fharmacy Records v. Nassar, 465 Fed.Appx. 448 February 23, 2012 (February 23, 2012).  This appeal is the continuation of a copyright lawyer’s worst nightmare.  In an earlier appeal 379 Fed.Appx. 522 (6th Cir. 2010), the Sixth Circuit upheld dismissal of a copyright infringement complaint for fraud on the court and imposed significant sanctions on counsel personally.  In this appeal, the district court awarded over $500,000 in attorneys fees against plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel jointly.  Suffice it to say that plaintiff’s counsel seems to have not focused objections on the matter before the court and wasted firepower on issues that were already law of the case.  This case is a must-read primer on how not to litigate a copyright case and the perils of compounding a bad case or theory by not promptly withdrawing it.

 www.dunnington.com
 Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook 2012-2013 by Raymond J. Dowd from West here