Washington Shoe Company v. A-Z Sporting Goods
Inc., 2012 WL 6582345 (9th
Circuit December 17, 2012). Long-time
Arkansas client of Washington Shoe Co. buys Chinese knockoffs of Washington
Shoe products. Sells in retail store in
Arkansas next to real Washington Shoe products.
Get cease and desist letter.
Sells knockoffs to thrift store.
Washington Shoe brings suit in Washington State. District court dismisses for lack of personal
jurisdiction. Ninth Circuit
reverses. Holds that intentional tort is
expressly aimed at copyright holder in Washington State. This is part of a trend of dramatically
expanding the concept of personal jurisdiction over defendants in copyright
infringement cases who satisfy none of the traditional criteria for long-arm
jurisdiction.
www.dunnington.com
Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook 2012-2013 by Raymond J. Dowd from West here
No comments:
Post a Comment